Monday, May 6, 2013

The Pastor in the Basement

1,095 Words
Target publication: Some religious magazine


           Drive South down Oakland Drive past rows and rows of suburban homes with immaculate lawns, and then take a right down Winchell Avenue. Keep going for about a quarter of a mile until you see a large brown-brick church with a wooden cross in the yard facing all who drive by. Open the door and accept a bulletin and a hug from the grandfatherly greeter. Look to the right at the empty, imposing sanctuary, with another cross standing behind a raised pulpit. Walk towards the sanctuary, only to be directed to the stairs on the left by the smiling greeter. Step into the basement lit by fluorescent lights, take a drink from the white water fountain and see the thirty or so gray-haired men and women milling around and finding seats as a younger man with an immaculately-trimmed beard fingerpicks his way through one of today’s hymns one last time before the service. Take a seat in one of the battered, mint-colored chairs arranged two-deep in a half-circle, and look at the man standing behind the communion table.
            He’s about fifty, bald, with glasses, clad in a dark-blue shirt with a blue-striped tie and grey pants, and he would look like a well-dressed accountant were it not for the fact that he is standing behind an altar wearing a rainbow-colored stole emblazoned prominently with various gay-pride symbols.
            That man is Ken Arthur, pastor of Phoenix Community Church, a small United Church of Christ congregation that rents out the basement of the larger Disciples of Christ church upstairs. He is gay, and so are about eighty percent of his parishioners. Most members of his flock are in their fifties or sixties, and they wear their identities proudly: their church’s symbol is a rainbow-colored phoenix rising up from the flames against the backdrop of the LGBTQ symbol. The church switches between the traditional and the nontraditional at breakneck speed. On any given Sunday, an Indigo Girls song might follow a traditional hymn or a reading of one of Whitman’s poems might follow the recitation of The Disciples’ Prayer. The one constant is Pastor Ken, the mastermind, the glue that holds the whole post-postmodern religious collage together.
            Ken never planned on becoming a pastor, even though he grew up attending church in his hometown of Anderson, Indiana. The church was quite rigid and conservative, though Ken remembers thinking it was liberal “because they let us go to the movies and play cards.” He distills the general mindset of the church thusly: “God is nice if you believe, and if you don’t, you go to hell.” This image of God as an angry father troubled Ken, and, unable to reconcile the idea of a loving God with the existence of hell, he dropped out of church and left his faith behind when he came to Kalamazoo College in 1984.
            After getting his bachelor’s degree in math from Kalamazoo and a master’s in Computer Science, Ken began working as a freelance computer programmer.  During his twenties, Ken says he was an agnostic, though he frequently picked up spiritual texts such as The Dao of Pooh, a book that is still jammed in his office bookshelf with scores of other texts about religion and philosophy.
            But that all changed in 1996 when Ken turned thirty. As Ken puts it, “I was thirty when I started dealing with being gay.” Ironically, Ken wound up coming back to church as part of the coming-out process. He heard that Phoenix Community was a church with a gay pastor, and he visited hoping to “meet more gay people in a safe environment.” Attending Phoenix, along doing affirmation exercises that made him “feel like Stuart Smalley,” helped Ken come to terms with his identity as a gay man. Ken kept coming on Sundays, and within two years became a full-fledged member of the church.            
            But despite his regular Church attendance, Ken remained a skeptic for several more years. Eventually, though, he wavered from his agnosticism and fell back into faith. Ken says that rediscovering faith was a slow, gradual process. His one “A-ha!” moment came when the pastor at Phoenix led the congregation in a decidedly non-Christian spiritual practice: shamanic journeying. Essentially, shamanic journeying is a distillation of shamanic traditions from man varied cultures. By listening to a repetitive tribal drumbeat, would-be journeyers are able to enter a trance-like altered state that allows them to tap into the collective unconscious. Ken relates shamanic journeying to Jungian psychology, saying that it is a way of “dreaming symbolic meanings from a divine power.” The experience opened him up to the more intuitive, visceral aspects of faith. Eventually, Ken began to believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ.
            Shortly after rediscovering his spirituality, Ken decided to pull up stakes and attend the Chicago Theological Seminary. While studying in the windy city, Ken decided that he “definitely didn’t want to be a minister” and opted to get a M.A. in Religious studies rather than the ministerial Master’s of Divinity.
            Shortly thereafter, Ken would, in fact, become a minister. When he returned, he found Phoenix in turmoil. Money, always a problem for small churches like Phoenix, had caused a great deal of discord among the congregation, and “enough people hurt enough other people” that one-third of the church left along with the pastor. Because of his background in the seminary, Ken was asked to fill in as an interim minister. However, as the interim period dragged on, he seemed more and more like the best candidate, and became Phoenix Community’s official pastor in 2010.
             As pastor, Ken promotes a brand of theology that rejects easy answers and “simple-minded, warm-and-fuzzy peace.” He welcomes questions and uncertainties. When asked about the specifics of the afterlife, he shrugs and says, “Who knows?” “When I talk about the Kingdom, I’m talking about realizing it here: working for peace and hope and justice here on Earth.”
            And Ken doesn’t do talk about the Kingdom in the prototypical preacher’s voice. His is a wispy tenor, not a booming baritone, and he speaks without amplification. His is a voice that is easily drowned out by anyone with a microphone, or even just a determined, loud man holding a sign on a street corner. He is not loud enough to compete with the Pat Robertson of the world. Yet when he preaches the Gospel, he still grabs you. The passion in his voice is palpable, like a cup running over quietly, as he preaches, love, justice, and reconciliation in the basement of a church.

7 comments:

  1. Wow Trevor, this is an awesome idea for a story and I think that you are executing it very well. I think you tell the story of Ken's life really well and so that aspect of the story comes through very clearly. I was left wondering though, maybe the Phoenix Community Church and not just Ken, would be a good focus for the story. I am interested in how this little LGBT-friendly church springs up in Kalamazoo, MI. I was wondering how many pastors they have had, what kind of networking they do in the community, etc.

    I think it is such a great topic and story that you have already begun, so adding this context could only enhance it. I am really looking forward to hearing more from you in class!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Trevor,

    Wow, you really had me expecting catastrophe after reading your process writing piece. This is quite the opposite! I can see why you were freaking out about word choice (not because I think yours is terrible, but because that is the characteristic of a piece that the overall captivating-ness usually hinges on), and I worried about it a fair bit as well. But sometimes you just have to get it out there and then the good words come with revision. I do think your words do the job though, and maybe they don't satisfy your standards right away, but that's why you have other people to tell you that its really way better than you seem to think it is.

    I agree with Matt... I would love to hear more of the story of the church, and some of the people in the congregation. What does the mother church think of this little sub-church that happens inside of it? It seems pretty reformed to me. If you can go again this sunday and get some of the information you wish you had, and just keep working with this piece it will go from really good to fantastic.

    See you tomorrow,
    Charlotte

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shalom Trevor,

    Ok dude, great job tackling a subject and subject metter that, if not reported on with tact, could offend a lot of people. I also loved the title and the final line of this piece. Although, I'm not sure I got the line about the cup. I was curious to see how your comedic voice would come through in this style of writing and I think it was just perfect. You had two, maybe three, subtle jokes and that was just enough. I also found the style of this piece to be good... in the beginning.

    After about the 3rd of 4th paragraph I found the piece dragging. You sort of fell into a rhythm of narrating and presenting events in this gentleman's life with little context or character. This wasn't necessarily terrible, it just got old after a while. I would also like to know more about this pastor personally. You have a lot about him and his relationship to the church, but what about his struggle with coming out? His childhood? A second interview could be necessary. I'm exciting to here your opinion about this piece (outside of "I may have shat the bed on this one" which I lol's at)

    See you tonight.

    Thanks

    Woody

    ReplyDelete
  4. Right on. I think that within this piece it's evident that you've done a lot of reporting, despite your lack of journalistic experience since middle school.

    I'm particularly interested in the parallel between Ken's coming out as a gay man and his coming into the church. I wonder if, in some way, shape or form, that is a thing you could play up. I'd be interested, too, to know how other people feel about that—whether you should choose one avenue over the other, or if it's okay (necessary?) to have them co-existing.

    My biggest thing was the ending—this piece feels like it ends in the middle to me, somehow, and I wonder if there's a more concrete way to fade out. I'm struggling with the same thing in mine—it's hard to end these.

    PEACE

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think you definitely have a very good base here to go off of when you are doing your rewrite. I wouldn't worry too much about the amount of reporting you've done so far because it seems like you have quite a bit of information already, and there are two weeks to get more if you need. It's definitely hard to talk about homosexuality and religion but you did a good job. One point I found very interesting that was not explored is that this church was in the basement of another church. What does that say about it? I don't know, I just felt like I wanted to know if they were there cause that's all they could afford, or that's all the space they needed, or if they planned on moving, it just interested me.

    I think you should consider adding a few more quotes, that should definitely move the story along and give a better feel for who your subject is as a person. I felt like I really didn't get a full grasp of who he was, but just what he'd done.

    There is definitely a good base here, so don't stress too much. I look forward to talking more in class.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'd have to agree with the notes on the ending...like we don't see the glue set and are expected to know that the paper mache is still going to hold together at the end of the day. Does he read those Whitman poems with a particular timbre? How does Ken involve himself in the congregation, right there and then?

    His homosexuality seems important to the context of the piece, and while you mention it, him being gay is sort of a side note. While it may seem awkward to delve into that, and mayhaps socially concerning as to why have to do this, I think it is integral to your piece that you really get a grasp on his sexuality and that ties it has to his church.

    Your topic choice, and your introductory images, are really intriguing, and I can't wait to see more of it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think I might know this person. I got to the part about the Chicago Theological Seminary (where my friend's mom), and I stopped. Funny, not sure about that, but still. Otherwise, I think you did a great job of hitting on some crucial aspects of Ken's life. The part where he become connected back to the Church during his coming-out process is wonderful and very interesting to me. I think you could even through in a couple more mini-stories here or quotes about his experience. This seems to be the crux of the piece.

    I got a little lost in the second half, just pull some crucial details out. If you want to focus on his ideas about the Kingdom, bring those in earlier and then tie it back at the end. It feels a little thrown in right now.

    See you in class.

    ReplyDelete